1001winampskins.com    
Home
Contact		 Help/FAQ
Chat		 Newsboard
Messageboard		 Submit a Skin
Member Login
WinampWinamp Skins
    
Skin Details

 Bang & Olufsen (blue) 2.50 
Classic Skin
Bang & Olufsen (blue) 2.50
 
Overall Rating 
62% Thumbs Up (10345+29 votes)
How do you like
this skin?!?		      


 
Details 
Author: bleach
Added: Dec 15, 1999
Category: Hi-Fi
Popularity: 0.1%
Downloads: 317,249
AVS Window: No
Video Window: No
Media Library: No
Cursors: Yes
MikroAMP:  No
Description: 22 words
Comments:

 35
 
Download 
BaO_blue.wsz (80 KB)


 Description 
some parts of the skin was created by bleach from Jan T. Sott's "Fossil 2002" skin. please check the credits for more.


 Comments 
Awful! This skin it's so simple( and had not a great look ),I don't understand why..

Posted by peppenet1 on Thursday, April 11th, 2002 at 05:32 PM CEST


Awful! In the description you say that "same parts of the skin was created by bleach from Jan T.Sott's "Fossil 2002" skin".I've found that skin on winamp.com and I think that your skin is only the perfect copy of "Fossil 2002"
Check it out at http://www.winamp.com/skins/detail.jhtml;?componentId=701

Posted by ssj on Sunday, April 21st, 2002 at 12:33 PM CEST


Awful! It is one of the easiest created skins i have ever seen. Why is it downloadet so often?

Sorry if my language is bad, I´m from Grmany.

Posted by nupert on Thursday, June 20th, 2002 at 02:03 PM CEST


Awful! SOME parts?!!? the full skin is pinched!!
but STOP...he changed the browser-buttons *clap*

Posted by joESmither on Monday, July 08th, 2002 at 02:44 PM CEST


Awful! WTF IS THIS!?!? U JUST CHANGED RED TO BLUE THIS SHOULD BE REMOVED.

Posted by sHoTTiE on Monday, July 29th, 2002 at 06:40 AM CEST


Awful! what the F@#$ !!! this is no different from the red, holy crap, what the hell is this doing here

Posted by CeO_Virus on Friday, August 09th, 2002 at 05:35 PM CEST


Weak! Pretty boring.

Posted by StillWater on Sunday, August 11th, 2002 at 01:43 PM CEST


Awful! Ok, a logo was added, labels were added, and title was changed, but apart from that, corrected link:
http://classic.winamp.com/skins/detail.jhtml?componentId=122684
Spotting the differences is like playing "Where's Waldo?" SOME parts of the skin? 'nuff said...

Posted by dimichan on Sunday, October 27th, 2002 at 02:39 AM CET


Excellent! Okay, do any of you, who are so quick to disparage this skin, actually know anything about Bang & Olufsen? I don't care that this skin is copied from something else. It screams B&O.

And, it's simplicity is what makes it so cool. It's my all time favorite!

Fabio

Posted by Lanzoni on Sunday, November 10th, 2002 at 05:37 AM CET


Awful! actually, this is nothing like B&O...perhaps closer in style to some of the B&O knockoffs out there... and therefore...kinda sucks!

(it's actually a fairly decent looking skin, copied or not, but the fact that it's attempting to pass itself off as B&O gives the thumbs down).

For a "real" B&O player (style and absolutely kick-ass operation) download the free B&O player from their website (www.bang-olufsen.com). it really is very well done mp3 player/organizer and the like. if fact, it hooks up to your B&O equipment so you can use it to play your mp3 off the units.

Posted by abronius on Tuesday, November 12th, 2002 at 05:03 AM CET


Excellent! Hey you morons screaming "Awful", just look at the date when the skin was released in 1999,i bet most of you didn`t use WA at that time.In 1999 this skin was one of the High Rated ones.Sure we have 2002 but whatcha expect from the author? since the skin was never updated from 1999 on.
Sometimes reading helps.

Posted by Bartekk on Thursday, December 05th, 2002 at 03:53 PM CET


My rating had nothing to do with that and everything to do with the facts that 1) there's only supposed to be one color release and 2) the author didn't make the skin, just added the B&O logo and MB buttons to "Fossil". That's not inspired, or even "using some parts", that's just adding a few items to someone else's work, permission or no, and to me should be reserved for personal use and not claimed as his own since most people are not going to read to see how much was taken.

Posted by dimichan on Saturday, December 07th, 2002 at 04:29 PM CET


Good! This skin looks quite good. It is simple, yet has a good effect

Posted by masta_krish on Sunday, January 19th, 2003 at 03:11 PM CET


Excellent! Great Skin!

Posted by blutech on Saturday, March 01st, 2003 at 06:04 PM CET


Awful! plain and simple rip. i have no time for theifs

Posted by (B)-art on Saturday, March 01st, 2003 at 06:17 PM CET


Weak! too plain and simple...

Posted by Cromova on Wednesday, March 05th, 2003 at 05:06 PM CET


Awful! doesnt this 1 come with winamp 2?

Posted by Evanescence on Sunday, June 08th, 2003 at 03:32 PM CEST


Awful! too simple but good idea :-)

Posted by f18hornet on Monday, July 07th, 2003 at 02:26 PM CEST


Awful! not that good at all...

Posted by xenosomething on Thursday, August 14th, 2003 at 12:08 PM CEST


Awful! Why is this the fourth most downloaded skin??? Does the author download it a trillion times a day or something? It's just nothing you should waste any Harddisk space on...

Posted by VenQWish on Saturday, August 23rd, 2003 at 08:09 PM CEST


Awful! Awful, Awful, but very popular. :-(

Posted by f18hornet on Thursday, September 04th, 2003 at 03:47 PM CEST


Awful! Way too plain.. I dont understand why so many people like it

Posted by phrost on Saturday, October 04th, 2003 at 08:42 PM CEST


Good! All those people download this skin to criticise it later after testing it or what? This skin could have been better. Too plain and yet too many downloads. People going nuts?? Try adding more detail to it. Ya, it's was added on 15 December 1999, now it's November 2003. Make a new skin, an upgraded one. Anyway, good job in 1999.

Posted by Lo Tern Chern on Thursday, November 06th, 2003 at 04:04 PM CET


Good! All those people download this skin to criticise it later after testing it or what? This skin could have been better. Too plain and yet too many downloads. People going nuts?? Try adding more detail to it. Ya, it's was added on 15 December 1999, now it's November 2003. Make a new skin, an upgraded one. Anyway, good job in 1999.

Posted by Lo Tern Chern on Thursday, November 06th, 2003 at 04:07 PM CET


Awful! Awful!!! This is a RIP skin from "FOSSIL 2002" skin, but very popular...

Posted by f18hornet on Friday, November 28th, 2003 at 01:28 PM CET


Good! People who say "awful", please make something better and you will see that it's very hard to do!!!
Good job bleach! not exellent but good!

Posted by Salamander on Wednesday, January 07th, 2004 at 02:50 PM CET


Average! hm. i have the general b&o skin. you are all right by saying that only the color is changed to blue. but i also agree with some of you who say that b&o products really look like this. it shouldn't be difficult to create this skin, but in the end, it's pretty nice...

Posted by Jen on Sunday, January 11th, 2004 at 03:17 AM CET


Excellent! the skin is clean to use but it needs more things added

Posted by azhaan123 on Saturday, February 14th, 2004 at 10:59 AM CET


Excellent! What can one say... Very B&O, nothing to complain about here! Keep it clean!

Posted by aosuhaeuhanoeu on Sunday, April 04th, 2004 at 11:45 AM CEST


Awful! Salamander: I think xenosomething, dimichan, and StillWater HAVE made better skins (every single time) and they don't seem to think highly of it either. OK, it is a very old rip, I mean skin. But it doesn't deserve to be one of the best skins just because it is a geriatric. Anyway, he really didn't change it at all. I think I'll slap the word "Magnivox" on Expensive Hi-Fi, publish it under my name, and see what happens.

Posted by jjpotter on Monday, April 05th, 2004 at 04:33 AM CEST


Awful! skinrobber from "Fossil 2002"

Posted by f18hornet on Monday, April 19th, 2004 at 03:01 PM CEST


Average! i didn't see fossil 2002,
but i see more skins worse than that and that's not a weak skin or awful, but it's strange so much downloads for a skin which is not excellent

Posted by altair4444 on Monday, July 12th, 2004 at 12:14 AM CEST


Awful! Here seems to be a working URL for Fossil 2002: http://www.mp3werk.de/skin/fossil.html

Posted by sctts on Sunday, August 08th, 2004 at 10:54 AM CEST


Good! It certainly looks like the new products of B&O BUT.....
If you really like B&O why not download the BeoPlayer from their own site!!! It takes a little while to get used to, but there is no skin out there that matches this, sorry for WinAmp :) or :( and it BeoPlayer sounds crispier too

ftp://ftp.beoplayer.com/BeoPlayer.exe

Posted by laggebek on Wednesday, November 08th, 2006 at 02:16 PM CET


1. the original fossil 200 can be found here: http://tr.im/2002iii

2. it's perfectly legal to do mods as long as the author acknowledges: http://tr.im/2002legal

Posted by yathosho on Saturday, October 03rd, 2009 at 01:24 PM CEST


Skin Search
 
Advanced Search

Selected Skins
 
 New & Fresh
Most Popular
Top Rated
Top Downloads
Most Talked About

Skin Categories
 
 Modern Skins Only
After Dark
Anime
Artistic
Brand Name
Car
Celebrity
Color Domination
Comic
Computer
Cool
Cutting Edge
Game
Hi-Fi
Less is More
Music
Regional
Remixed
Sports
TV + Movie
University
Website

Software
 
 Winamp 5.5
Winamp 2.91
Language Packs
Skin Tools

Selected Members
 
 Top Skin Authors
Top Skin Reviewers
Top MsgBrd Posters

Free Membership
 
 Join the skin community and become a free member of 1001 Winamp Skins

Partner Sites
 
 1001 Fonts
FontFinder.ws

Top Links
 
 MPeX.net
skinz.org
lotsofskins.com